Bridgestone ROA 2010-2024 | BRDCY
Current and historical return on assets (ROA) values for Bridgestone (BRDCY) over the last 10 years. Return on assets can be defined as an indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. Calculated by dividing a company's operating earnings by its total assets.
| Bridgestone ROA - Return on Assets Historical Data |
| Date |
TTM Net Income |
Total Assets |
Return on Assets |
| 2024-03-31 |
$4.41B |
$37.46B |
11.10% |
| 2023-03-31 |
$4.01B |
$37.96B |
10.13% |
| 2022-03-31 |
$3.87B |
$40.34B |
9.97% |
| 2021-03-31 |
$3.99B |
$43.20B |
10.68% |
| 2020-03-31 |
$1.83B |
$36.84B |
5.34% |
| 2019-03-31 |
$2.15B |
$34.89B |
6.54% |
| 2018-03-31 |
$2.20B |
$34.55B |
6.87% |
| 2017-03-31 |
$2.31B |
$31.07B |
7.30% |
| 2016-03-31 |
$2.26B |
$30.74B |
6.91% |
| 2015-03-31 |
$2.37B |
$31.64B |
6.84% |
| 2014-03-31 |
$2.28B |
$33.38B |
6.42% |
| 2013-03-31 |
$2.00B |
$35.23B |
5.56% |
| 2012-12-31 |
$2.06B |
$37.99B |
5.68% |
| 2012-09-30 |
$1.73B |
$35.46B |
4.88% |
| 2012-06-30 |
$1.57B |
$34.86B |
4.46% |
| 2012-03-31 |
$1.44B |
$36.59B |
4.12% |
| 2011-12-31 |
$1.28B |
$34.81B |
3.77% |
| 2011-09-30 |
$1.41B |
$34.41B |
4.31% |
| 2011-06-30 |
$1.32B |
$33.42B |
4.10% |
| 2011-03-31 |
$1.34B |
$32.98B |
4.32% |
| 2010-12-31 |
$1.15B |
$29.77B |
3.78% |
| 2010-09-30 |
$1.08B |
$32.21B |
3.50% |
| 2010-06-30 |
$0.93B |
$29.14B |
3.06% |
| 2010-03-31 |
$0.59B |
$30.86B |
1.96% |
| 2009-12-31 |
$0.03B |
$30.89B |
0.08% |
| Sector |
Industry |
Market Cap |
Revenue |
| Auto/Tires/Trucks |
Auto Manufacturers - Foreign |
$28.995B |
$29.301B |
|
Bridgestone is involved in the Automotive Industry. Their printing system allows for the real time, on-site creation of vehicle registration forms and license decals on blank stock, including the imprinting of the vehicle license plate number on the decal. This on-demand printing capability allows Departments of Motor Vehicles to substantially reduce fraud and theft, increase revenue collection, and reduce personnel, inventory, andfacility costs as a result of increased efficiencies.
|
